Bank failure and economic development in nigeria A critical appraisal

5 Chapters
|
67 Pages
|
9,815 Words
|

Bank failures can significantly impact economic development by disrupting financial stability and eroding public confidence in the banking system. When banks fail, depositors may lose their savings, leading to a loss of trust in the financial institutions and the overall economic system. This can result in a contraction of credit availability, hindering investment and business expansion. Moreover, bank failures may trigger a domino effect, affecting other sectors and causing a decline in economic activity. Governments often intervene to mitigate the consequences of bank failures through financial regulations, deposit insurance, and bailouts, but these interventions can have their own challenges and may not always prevent negative repercussions on economic development. A resilient and well-regulated banking sector is crucial for sustaining economic growth and stability.

PROPOSAL

This study is not antagonistic to any other rather if is complimentary. Other works has been use and are duly appreciated. But everything is with intent to find a lasting solution to the issue bank failure.
The study was based upon data collected through information sifted formbooks general annual report and periodicals. All the relevant data obtained were analyzed generally and are used to deduce the findings. The author started by presenting the proposal.
The chapter one of the study has to do with the background of the study, statement of the study, objective of the study, significance of the study, limitation of the study and definition of terms.
Chapter two is the literature review of the genesis of banking in Nigeria, function of banking, similarities and differences among the banks, role of bank in the economic development, the Nigerian banking climate, problem faced by banks, the concept of bank failure, indices of bank failure and the effect of bank failure.
Chapter three was research methodology, which lead into sampling techniques, data collection and method of data analysis.
Chapter is based on finding that results into general discussion.
Chapter is the recommendation and the conclusion.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Title page
Approval page.
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Table of content

CHAPTER ONE:
1.1 THE BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
1.2 Statement of problems
1.3 Objective of study
1.4 Significance of study
1.5 Limitation of study
1.6 Definition of terms
1.7 Reference

CHAPTER TWO:
2. 0 Literature review
2.1 Genesis of banking in Nigeria
2.2 Type of banking in Nigeria
2.3 Functions of banking
2.4 Similarities and differences among banks
2.5 Role of bank in the economic development
2.6 The Nigeria banking climate
2.7 Problems faced by banks
2.8 The concept of banking failure
2.9 Causes of banking failure
2.10 Indices of banking failure
2.11 Effect of bank failure
2.12 Reference.

CHPATER THREE:
3.1 Research methodology
3.2 Sapling techniques
3.3 Data collection
3.4 Source of secondary data
3.5 Method of analysis
3.6 Reference

CHAPTER FOUR:
4.0 Findings
4.1 General discussion
4.2 Reference

CHAPTER FIVE:
5.0 Recommendation and conclusion
5.1 Recommendation
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Biography

CHAPTER ONE

 INTRODUCTION:
Over the last couple of decades, the Nigeria financial system has grown remarkably. From the almost crude of it was characterized with in pre –colonial and colonial days. It has become so sophisticated toady that economic experts can proudly thumb their chests. With due regards to the ownership structure of the institution, the regulatory flame work, the instruments employed, and the number of established institution, Nigeria can be said to posses the most sophisticated financial system in Africa.

Within the Nigeria financial system itself, the banking system itself, the banking institution has been the most remarkable in growth. This is just as well in any case considering the critical position, which they occupy. In a complex financial position, which they occupy, in a complex financial position, which supplies the money and the credit, need of the economy.

The work bank and banker is neither used or define. In the central of Nigeria (CBN) degree NO 24 of the 1991 nor bank or other financial institutions decree (Bofio) No 25 of the 1991 2 of P5.115 of exchange act 1881 provides that bankers include a body of persons whether incorporated or not who carry out the business of banking. Section (1) of the evidence act define banks or bankers as any person or persons, partnership or company carrying on the business of banking.

Financially, the banking act of 1969 produces that bank means any person who carries out the business of banking and include commercial bank and an acceptance house. The role of banks is thus an important one in the process of economic development in the sense that they mobilize fund form the surplus spending and for the economy. In this way they increase the quantum of national saving and investments. Secondary though an appropriate investment multiplier. The volume of goods produced increase as a result of projects financed by bank funds, all of which lead to a successful promotion of an efficient system of payment. Creating banking habits development in the society and providing employment opportunities.

In view of this highlights, it become easily comprehensible why the failure of the bank has a far – reaching consequence.
The ability of a bank to operate successfully rest on how well they are able to obtained the confidence of the public. If that confidence is missing, the gap will be too great for the bank to fill. The effect of bank failure on the economic development of Nigeria can be express in a nut –shell to be the following;

Lack of effective and efficient financial intimidation:
Loss of public confidence in the system, further depression of the economic additional burdens on the regulatory authorities – education of the social vice for the sake of the citizenry and in the interest of economic development, there is an expedient need to device a host of remedying situations.

The fact that a bank fails today is not to say those incidences are not systematic. There must be a number of ways out of any predicament. The only crack is how effectively employed. Such remedy includes;

a) The cultivation of a stable political environment.
b) The strengthening of the regulatory agency
c) The taking over by regulatory bodies of all termnacy distressed banks.
d) Encouragement of banking education
e) Sincere pursuit by government of all economy and monetary policies
f) All regulation pertaining capital, adequacy, minimum paid up capital, requidity ratio and quality should be reviewed in relation to inflation rate.
g) Privatization and commercialization of all government owned banks
h) All dept owned banks by government (state, federal and even parietals) should be paid back immediately.
i) All laws relating to bankruptcy and default should be reviewed and made more effective.
An address like this will go a long way in remedying the situation and restoring public confidence in the system.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS
In the light of the vital role which banks play in the development, the national economy in their capacity as vectors of fund for saving, investment and employment opportunities. It will be expedient to point out that Nigeria banking system in all its advancement and sophistications has not succeeded yet in effectively archiving this mission. The reason is not just the fact that some banks have failed, but some factor continues to militate against the successful performance of banks.

The problem of economic under – development in Nigeria can arguably be traced to the fact that banks has been as efficient as they ought to be. But then a number of factors have been responsible for the conditions in which banks have found themselves in today. The effect of bank failure ranges from lose of depositors fund to loose of confidence (which is the spicing board in the business of banking) to a total lack of effective financial intermediation such as to reduce rending to priority sector of the economy and an unusual increase of distress in other sub – sector. Then the problem of bank failure is not peculiar to Nigeria neither is it peculiar to this third world countries, it is universal and the cause are generally in the same district categories. The only different lies in the different way through which the situation can be remedied.

THE CAUSE OF BANK FAILURE
Incompetent management (both shear holders and management executives), capital inadequacy, poor internal control, poor asset quality compilation and such factors as economic environment, socio – political environment and government

1.3 THE OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The objective of this study is to critically appraise “ bank failure and economic development. That is the impact which bank failure has had on the development of the Nigeria economy with a view to highlighting the implication on the depositors, the public, the affected bank, the entire banking industry and the general micro – economy. Subsequently, and engenders will be portrayed as to how the tied will be stemmed and the situation tackled in an effective manner.
The study will go ahead to reveal the prospect of banking in the future.

1.4 SIGINIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study is significance in the sense that a careful appraisal with intent to reveal the genesis of bank failure in Nigeria, he root causes of bank failure, how to avert bank failure and in the event of an inability to avert this, how to deal with the situation effectively.
The study will be of immense use to scholars in the field of banking and officials of regulatory agencies and intellectuals in the field of banking.

1.5 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The sensitive nature of the study made it very difficult for the researcher to obtain some very vital information from the banks. A wind who asked that we direct all information to bank executives stationed at there head offices, as they were not competent to speak on such matters. Now to see there executive necessitate traveling a great distance.

This has a telling effect on us financially. And talk about the attendant risk involves considering the state of our high ways. Another constraints was that even the executives of known bank currently under liquidation refuses to admit this and so kept a lot of information from us that is as regards briefs from (B.M. or N.O.I.C). The most telling constraint however was time. The time on our hands was very limited. It was not very easy for us to lay our hands on all the secondary data, which wee require for the study as the N.O.I.C in Enugu has not got a library and the C.B.N library was not equipped to our taste.

1.6 DEFINITION OF TERMS
1. Risk asset: Asset, which by there nature is prone to lose.
2. Liquidity: This is the mobility of a bank to meet its liability as they mature for payment.
3. Liquidity Ratio: this is the ratio of liquid asset to total deposit liability.
4. Insolvency: This is when the value of realizable asset is less than total value liability.
5. Liquidation: – The taking over of the asset and liabilities of a bank by the regulatory agent after the bank has been adjudged failed.
6. Holding action: This is action, which prohibits or curtail certain activities of boards or management or certain activity required of them to ensure bank safety.
7. Macro economy: These are the action taking by the government agency responsible for the conduct of economic prices to archive desired objectives.
8. N.D.I.C: Nigeria deposit insurance company.

Save/Share This On Social Media:
MORE DESCRIPTION:

Bank failure and economic development:

Bank failures can have significant impacts on economic development. The relationship between bank failures and economic development is complex and can vary depending on the circumstances, the regulatory environment, and the overall health of the financial system. Here are some key ways in which bank failures can affect economic development:

  1. Disruption of Financial Intermediation: Banks play a crucial role in the economy by intermediating between savers and borrowers. When banks fail, this intermediation process can break down. Borrowers may find it more difficult and expensive to access credit, which can stifle investment and economic growth.
  2. Loss of Savings: Bank failures can lead to losses for depositors. If depositors lose confidence in the banking system, they may withdraw their funds, leading to a bank run or panic. This can further erode the stability of the financial system and undermine economic development.
  3. Credit Crunch: After bank failures, surviving banks may become more risk-averse and tighten their lending standards. This can result in a credit crunch, where even creditworthy borrowers have difficulty obtaining loans. Reduced access to credit can impede business expansion and entrepreneurship, hindering economic development.
  4. Reduced Investment: Bank failures can lead to a decrease in investment in the affected region or country. Investors may become wary of putting their money into an area with a fragile banking system, reducing capital flows and potential economic growth.
  5. Confidence and Perception: Bank failures can dent public confidence in the financial system. When people lose faith in banks, they may be less willing to participate in financial markets, invest in stocks or bonds, or use banking services, all of which can slow economic development.
  6. Government Interventions: In many cases, governments step in to prevent systemic collapses of the banking sector. While these interventions can prevent further damage to the economy, they can also have fiscal costs that strain government budgets, potentially leading to reduced public spending on infrastructure and social programs that are essential for long-term development.
  7. Regulatory Changes: Bank failures often lead to changes in financial regulations. While these changes are aimed at preventing future failures, they can also impose additional costs and compliance burdens on banks, potentially affecting their ability to support economic development.
  8. Long-Term Consequences: The effects of bank failures can be long-lasting. Even if the immediate crisis is resolved, the damage to confidence and the financial system’s reputation can persist, affecting economic development for years.

It’s important to note that the impact of bank failures on economic development can vary widely depending on the scale of the failure, the strength of the regulatory response, the overall health of the economy, and many other factors. Moreover, some level of creative destruction is inherent in any economic system, and the failure of inefficient or poorly managed banks can create space for more efficient financial institutions to emerge, potentially supporting long-term economic development. However, managing and mitigating the negative consequences of bank failures is a key challenge for policymakers and regulators in fostering sustainable economic growth.