Organizational Structure And Employees’ Performance

Of Dangote Cement Plc Ibese Plant

68 Pages 16,138 WordsDownload Complete Material

The Organizational Structure And Employees’ Performance Complete Project Material (PDF/DOC)

Abstract

By deciding how to approach the markets and customers, organizations placed employees into different strategic positions to execute the strategies and pursue objectives established by the organization. Therefore, this study investigate the effect of organizational structure on employees’ performance of Dangote Cement Plc. Ibese Plant. Survey research design was adopted for the study. The population consists of all employees working in Administrative unit of the organization with staff strength of 172. Census model was used to select all the population as the sample size, while structured questionnaire was used to gather data on a 4-point likert scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree. The data gathered was analysed using descriptive statistics and linear regression with the aid of SPSS V. 23. The findings of the study revealed that: formalization has a weak positive significant effect on employees’ performance (β = 0.239, p<0.05); centralization has a weak positive significant effect on employees’ performance (β = 0.305, p<0.05); complexity has a weak positive significant relationship with employees’ performance. Based on the findings, the study concluded that organizational structure has significant effect on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc. Ibese Plant. Therefore, the study recommended that: organization should reduce applying too rigid rules. As high degree of rules may not only deprive employees from using their initiative but also discourage creativity; they should give more serious attention to designing an appropriate structure that must match all units.

Aims and Objectives

The major objective of this study is to examine the effect of organizational structure on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant. Other objectives are to:

  1. Investigate the effect of Formalization on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant
  2. Determine the effect of Centralization on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant
  3. Examine the effect of Complexity on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant
Research Questions

The following questions are what the study tends to find answers to:

  1. What is the effect of formalization on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant?
  2. Does centralization has effect on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant?
  3. To what extent does complexity affect employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant?
Hypothesis Of The Study

The following statement of null hypotheses were formulated for the study:

H01:     Formalization has no significant effect on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant

H02:     Centralization has no significant effect on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant

H03:     Complexity has no significant effect on employees’ performance in Dangote Cement Plc., Ibese Plant

Chapter One

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Information to the Study
In this present business world, there is hardly any organization that does not have profit and growth as its main objectives. The growth of a firm is principally measured on the percentage of market share captured and client served. By deciding how to approach the markets and customers, employees are placed into different strategic positions to execute the strategies and pursue objectives established by the organization (Nwosu, 2020). The placement of organizational members into strategic positions of responsibility with authority with a view to achieving organizational objectives is structuring. Hence organizational structure is sine qua non to continuous existence of every organization. To attain objectives, organizations must channel employee endeavors in unified direction and established means of allocating resources/responsibilities and control under arrangements referred to as structure. Thus, organizational structure is how job task is formally divided, grouped and coordinated (Nosike, Okoye & Afodigbueokwu, 2021).

Organizational structure according to Robins, Judge, and Vohra (2021) explains how work tasks are formally separated, categorized, and coordinated. As a result, managers must pursue corporate growth through effective organizational structure, formalization, and chain of command. Organizational structure describes the formal arrangement of jobs and tasks in organizations. It describes the allocation of authority and responsibility, and how rules and regulation are executed by workers in firms (Lankas, Naikuni & Kulet, 2022). Nelson and Quick (2021) posit that the structure gives an organization the form to fulfill its functions in its operating environment.

The necessity for effective organizational structures that would support smooth manufacturing processes and hence promote corporate growth has arisen as a result of the competitive business climate and increased demand for goods and services from organizations (Bekanwah, Miidom & Ukoha, 2020). Therefore, managers who set out to design an organization structure face difficult decisions, as they must choose among a myriad of alternative frameworks of jobs and departments (Ugwu, Nnadi & Udeze, 2019). The first decision focuses on individual jobs, the second decisions focus on departments or groups of jobs, while the next decision considers the issue of delegation of authority throughout the structure (Aghion, 2020). No matter the choice the manager or a person designing the structure may take, its essence is to create an internal mechanism that reflects authority and responsibility distribution within the organization and equally show the communication channel and task coordination framework in the organization.

According to Rezaeian (2022) organizational structure is the system of relations, formed unofficially, approved officially and dominating the activities of people who are interdependent for achieving their common goals. In other word, it is the way or method, through which the organizational activities are divided, organized and coordinated. Organizations create the structures to coordinate and control the activities of the members. Organizational structure is the framework of relationships, dominating the jobs, systems, operational processes, people and groups that are trying to achieve their goal (Jamshidi, 2023). Through organizational structure, the operations and activities inside the organization are coordinated and the responsibilities and authorities are determined, the structure is the manifestation of systematic thinking (Forouhi, 2020).

Ugwu et al. (2019) posit that organizational structure is used by various firms as a control mechanism to affect employee work outcomes, to ensure that the required tasks are performed effectively and efficiently, and to assist the attainment of organizational goals and objectives. Organizational structure defines the scope of behaviour within an organization, its lines of authority, accountability and to some extent, the organization’s relationship with its external environment. It shows the pattern of relationship with jobs within an organization (Archibong, 2019). Armour (2019) added that organizational structure determines the pattern of communication as well as the formal lines of interaction between individuals within organizations.

A good structure nevertheless does not by itself produce expected performance. Hence, a structure of an organization affects not only employee performance but the overall organizational performance and efficiency of organization. It also determines the rate at which the organization responds to environmental changes and therefore must be aligned with the goals and strategies of the organization. Poor organization structure aids poor performance irrespective of the ability of the manager (Bassey & Umoh, 2020). Thus, the organizational structure is a powerful tool for realizing and achieving organizational objectives.

Similarly, poor organization structure restricts individual growth, self-fulfillment and psychological health of the workforce resulting in failure, frustrations and conflict which hinders organizational growth and development (Burton & Obel, 2019).  This implies that organizational structure affects employee job satisfaction which ultimately impacts on performance. Therefore, the extent to which an organizational structure reduces ambiguity for an employee and clarifies problems such as what the employee is supposed to do, how the employee is supposed to do it, who the employee reports to, who the employee should meet in the event of problems; in all affects their attitudes to work and equally motivates employees to higher performance. Organizational structure is therefore a critical component that drives organizational success.

Chapter Two

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction

The chapter presents a review of related literature that supports the current research on the Organizational Structure And Employees’ Performance, systematically identifying documents with relevant analyzed information to help the researcher understand existing knowledge, identify gaps, and outline research strategies, procedures, instruments, and their outcomes

How To Download Complete Material (PDF/Doc)

This Research Work On “Organizational Structure And Employees’ Performance” Complete Material Can Be Downloaded Through Whatsapp, Email Or Download Link. Click The Below Button To Proceed:

Disclamer:

This study on the Organizational Structure And Employees’ Performance is solely for academic research purposes only and should be used as a research guideline or source of ideas. Copying word-for-word or submitting the entire project work to your school is unethical academic behavior and “UniProjects” is not part of it.